On 11/28/2017 11:54 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:49:18AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:21:40AM -0700, Allison Henderson wrote:From: Dave Chinner<dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> Add parent pointer attribute during xfs_create, and subroutines to initialize attributes [bfoster: rebase, use VFS inode generation] [achender: rebased, changed __unint32_t to xfs_dir2_dataptr_t, fixed some null pointer bugs, merged error handling patch, added subroutines to handle attribute initialization] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner<dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Allison Henderson<allison.henderson@xxxxxxxxxx> --- v2: remove unnecessary ENOSPC handling in xfs_attr_set_first_parent Signed-off-by: Allison Henderson<allison.henderson@xxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/xfs/Makefile | 1 + fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_parent.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ fs/xfs/xfs_attr.h | 15 +++++++- fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 16 +++++++- 4 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/xfs/Makefile b/fs/xfs/Makefile index ec6486b..3015bca 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/Makefile +++ b/fs/xfs/Makefile @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ xfs-y += $(addprefix libxfs/, \ xfs_inode_fork.o \ xfs_inode_buf.o \ xfs_log_rlimit.o \ + xfs_parent.o \ xfs_ag_resv.o \ xfs_rmap.o \ xfs_rmap_btree.o \ diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_parent.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_parent.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5eec0ab --- /dev/null +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_parent.c @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ +/* + * Copyright (c) 2015 Red Hat, Inc. + * All rights reserved./me sticks his hand in the hornet's nest: given how much Allison has reworked the original pptr code to use deferred ops, maybe it's more appropriate to have both the RH copyright for the original code and the oracle copyright for the pptr stuff at the top of this file? (Not a lawyer, don't play one on tv.)+ * + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as + * published by the Free Software Foundation. + * + * This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful, + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the + * GNU General Public License for more details. + * + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License + * along with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation + */ +#include "xfs.h" +#include "xfs_fs.h" +#include "xfs_format.h" +#include "xfs_log_format.h" +#include "xfs_shared.h" +#include "xfs_trans_resv.h" +#include "xfs_mount.h" +#include "xfs_bmap_btree.h" +#include "xfs_inode.h" +#include "xfs_error.h" +#include "xfs_trace.h" +#include "xfs_trans.h" +#include "xfs_attr.h" + +/* + * Parent pointer attribute handling. + * + * Because the attribute value is a filename component, it will never be longer + * than 255 bytes. This means the attribute will always be a local format + * attribute as it is xfs_attr_leaf_entsize_local_max() for v5 filesystems will + * always be larger than this (max is 75% of block size). + * + * Creating a new parent attribute will always create a new attribute - there + * should never, ever be an existing attribute in the tree for a new inode. + * ENOSPC behaviour is problematic - creating the inode without the parent + * pointer is effectively a corruption, so we allow parent attribute creation + * to dip into the reserve block pool to avoid unexpected ENOSPC errors from + * occurring. + */ + + +/* Initializes a xfs_parent_name_rec to be stored as an attribute name */ +void +xfs_init_parent_name_rec( + struct xfs_parent_name_rec *rec, + unsigned long long int p_ino,xfs_ino_t ?+ unsigned int p_gen,uint32_t ?
Ok, I'll get these updated
+ unsigned int p_diroffset) +{ + rec->p_ino = cpu_to_be64(p_ino); + rec->p_gen = cpu_to_be32(p_gen); + rec->p_diroffset = cpu_to_be32(p_diroffset); +} + +/* Initializes a xfs_parent_name_irec from an xfs_parent_name_rec */ +void +xfs_init_parent_name_irec( + struct xfs_parent_name_irec *irec, + struct xfs_parent_name_rec *rec) +{ + irec->p_ino = be64_to_cpu(rec->p_ino); + irec->p_gen = be32_to_cpu(rec->p_gen); + irec->p_diroffset = be32_to_cpu(rec->p_diroffset); +} + +/* + * Add a parent record to an inode with existing parent records. + */ +int +xfs_parent_add( + struct xfs_trans *tp, + struct xfs_inode *parent, + struct xfs_inode *child, + struct xfs_name *child_name, + uint32_t diroffset, + struct xfs_defer_ops *dfops, + xfs_fsblock_t *firstblock)This function doesn't use tp or firstblock, so you can omit the parameters.+{ + struct xfs_parent_name_rec rec; + + xfs_init_parent_name_rec(&rec, parent->i_ino, + VFS_I(parent)->i_generation, diroffset); + + return xfs_attr_set_deferred(child, dfops, &rec, sizeof(rec), + (void *)child_name->name, child_name->len, ATTR_PARENT); +}Do you think these functions will be useful for xfs_repair (and xfs_scrub) to rebuild the parent pointers? These three functions seem like the sort of thing that could go into libxfs/xfs_parent.c to get shared around. I guess I did babble last week about moving pretty much everything related to handling the pptr xattrs into libxfs so that the only code in fs/xfs/xfs_parent.c is the ioctl implementation. Maybe also an enhanced "connect this file handle dentry to its parents" feature for file handle users, though the current system hasn't generated a ton of complaints so this might be unnecessary.Bah, /me fails to notice that this was added to libxfs/xfs_parent.c. Please substitute the previous two paragraphs with: Why are the function prototypes for these functions in fs/xfs/xfs_attr.h? They ought to be in libxfs/xfs_parent.h. --D
No worries, I think I had added them there next to the other create routines before they got removed from the last version. I will move them over to xfs_parent.h
--Ddiff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_attr.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_attr.h index 1f5c711..09ef747 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_attr.h +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_attr.h @@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ #define __XFS_ATTR_H__#include "libxfs/xfs_defer.h"+#include "libxfs/xfs_da_format.h" +#include "libxfs/xfs_format.h"struct xfs_inode;struct xfs_da_args; @@ -184,5 +186,16 @@ int xfs_attr_set_deferred(struct xfs_inode *dp, struct xfs_defer_ops *dfops, unsigned int valuelen, int flags); int xfs_attr_remove_deferred(struct xfs_inode *dp, struct xfs_defer_ops *dfops, void *name, unsigned int namelen, int flags); - +/* + * Parent pointer attribute prototypes + */ +void xfs_init_parent_name_rec(struct xfs_parent_name_rec *rec, + unsigned long long int p_ino, unsigned int p_gen, + unsigned int p_diroffset); +void xfs_init_parent_name_irec(struct xfs_parent_name_irec *irec, + struct xfs_parent_name_rec *rec); +int xfs_parent_add(struct xfs_trans *tp, struct xfs_inode *parent, + struct xfs_inode *child, struct xfs_name *child_name, + xfs_dir2_dataptr_t diroffset, struct xfs_defer_ops *dfops, + xfs_fsblock_t *firstblock); #endif /* __XFS_ATTR_H__ */ diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c index f7986d8..1c45c73 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c @@ -1164,6 +1164,7 @@ xfs_create( struct xfs_dquot *pdqp = NULL; struct xfs_trans_res *tres; uint resblks; + xfs_dir2_dataptr_t diroffset;trace_xfs_create(dp, name); @@ -1253,7 +1254,7 @@ xfs_create(error = xfs_dir_createname(tp, dp, name, ip->i_ino, &first_block, &dfops, resblks ? resblks - XFS_IALLOC_SPACE_RES(mp) : 0, - NULL); + &diroffset); if (error) { ASSERT(error != -ENOSPC); goto out_trans_cancel; @@ -1272,6 +1273,19 @@ xfs_create( }/*+ * If we have parent pointers, we need to add the attribute containing + * the parent information now. This must be done within the same + * transaction the directory entry is created, while the new inode + * contains nothing in the inode literal area. + */ + if (xfs_sb_version_hasparent(&mp->m_sb)) { + error = xfs_parent_add(tp, dp, ip, name, diroffset, + &dfops, &first_block); + if (error) + goto out_bmap_cancel; + } + + /* * If this is a synchronous mount, make sure that the * create transaction goes to disk before returning to * the user. -- 2.7.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message tomajordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info athttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__vger.kernel.org_majordomo-2Dinfo.html&d=DwIBAg&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=LHZQ8fHvy6wDKXGTWcm97burZH5sQKHRDMaY1UthQxc&m=pCNDoHbIEzOXYs_xG8vyNzjLRVTHUvJd0iTmeI0T0Nk&s=qkaTRZTOctSKb7vASgNK9EpEnLVhVPD_EU-pgcoZCOE&e=-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message tomajordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info athttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__vger.kernel.org_majordomo-2Dinfo.html&d=DwIBAg&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=LHZQ8fHvy6wDKXGTWcm97burZH5sQKHRDMaY1UthQxc&m=pCNDoHbIEzOXYs_xG8vyNzjLRVTHUvJd0iTmeI0T0Nk&s=qkaTRZTOctSKb7vASgNK9EpEnLVhVPD_EU-pgcoZCOE&e=-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message tomajordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info athttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__vger.kernel.org_majordomo-2Dinfo.html&d=DwIBAg&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=LHZQ8fHvy6wDKXGTWcm97burZH5sQKHRDMaY1UthQxc&m=pCNDoHbIEzOXYs_xG8vyNzjLRVTHUvJd0iTmeI0T0Nk&s=qkaTRZTOctSKb7vASgNK9EpEnLVhVPD_EU-pgcoZCOE&e=
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
