On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 03:24:32PM -0500, Brian Foster wrote: > The tr_ifree transaction handles inode unlinks and inode chunk > frees. The current transaction calculation does not accurately > reflect worst case changes to the inode btree, however. The inobt > portion of the current transaction reservation only covers > modification of a single inobt buffer (for the particular inode > record). This is a historical artifact from the days before XFS > supported full inode chunk removal. > > When support for inode chunk removal was added in commit > 254f6311ed1b ("Implement deletion of inode clusters in XFS."), the > additional log reservation required for chunk removal was not added > correctly. The new reservation only considered the header overhead > of associated buffers rather than the full contents of the btrees > and AGF and AGFL buffers affected by the transaction. The > reservation for the free space btrees was subsequently fixed up in > commit 5fe6abb82f76 ("Add space for inode and allocation btrees to > ITRUNCATE log reservation"), but the res. for full inobt joins has > never been added. > > Update xfs_calc_ifree_reservation() to include a full inobt join in > the reservation calculation. Refactor the undocumented +2 blocks for > the AGF and AGFL buffers into the appropriate place so they are > accounted as sectors (not FSBs) and update the associated comments. > > Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c | 11 +++++------ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c > index 6bd916bd35e2..4cd7cd1e60da 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c > @@ -490,10 +490,10 @@ xfs_calc_symlink_reservation( > /* > * In freeing an inode we can modify: > * the inode being freed: inode size > - * the super block free inode counter: sector size > + * the super block free inode counter, AGF and AGFL: sector size > * the agi hash list and counters: sector size > - * the inode btree entry: block size > * the on disk inode before ours in the agi hash list: inode cluster size > + * the inode chunk is marked stale (headers only) > * the inode btree: max depth * blocksize > * the allocation btrees: 2 trees * (max depth - 1) * block size > * the finobt (record insertion, removal or modification) > @@ -504,12 +504,11 @@ xfs_calc_ifree_reservation( > { > return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp) + > xfs_calc_inode_res(mp, 1) + * the inode being freed: inode size > - xfs_calc_buf_res(1, mp->m_sb.sb_sectsize) + > - xfs_calc_buf_res(1, XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, 1)) + > + xfs_calc_buf_res(3, mp->m_sb.sb_sectsize) + * the super block free inode counter, AGF and AGFL: sector size [missing, hidden in calc_iunlink_remove] * the agi hash list and counters: sector size > xfs_calc_iunlink_remove_reservation(mp) + * the on disk inode before ours in the agi hash list: inode cluster size [missing] * on-disk inode to log the di_next_unlinked: inode cluster size Yes, check the xfs_iunlink_remove() code - we can log two inode cluster buffers there: the one prior to us in the unlinked list, and ours to reset the di_next_unlinked pointer to null. IOWs, xfs_calc_iunlink_remove_reservation() needs to take into account /2/ inode cluster buffers, not one. > xfs_calc_buf_res(1, 0) + No idea what this is. > - xfs_calc_buf_res(2 + mp->m_ialloc_blks + > - mp->m_in_maxlevels, 0) + > + xfs_calc_buf_res(mp->m_ialloc_blks, 0) + * the inode chunk is marked stale (headers only) > + xfs_calc_buf_res(mp->m_in_maxlevels, XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, 1)) + * the inode btree: max depth * blocksize > xfs_calc_buf_res(xfs_allocfree_log_count(mp, 1), > XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, 1)) + * the allocation btrees: 2 trees * (max depth - 1) * block size > xfs_calc_finobt_res(mp, 0, 1); * the finobt (record insertion, removal or modification) The rest look fine. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html