Re: [PATCH] xfs: log recovery should replay deferred ops in order

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Darrick,

this looks generally good to me:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

But I have a few nitpicks below:

> +	/*
> +	 * We're finishing the defer_ops that accumulated as a result of
> +	 * recovering unfinished intent items during log recovery.  We
> +	 * reserve an itruncate transaction because it is the largest
> +	 * permanent transaction type.  Since we're the only user of the
> +	 * fs right now, take 93% of the available free blocks.  Use
> +	 * weird math to avoid a 64-bit division.
> +	 */

Those magic 93% are 15/16th, maybe better to write it that way :)
That being said / 16 still is a 64-bit division, and I'm pretty sure
we'll run into an old gcc on some weird architecture that will not
turn it into a shift, so better write it as a shift to start with.

> +	freeblks = percpu_counter_sum(&mp->m_fdblocks);
> +	resblks = min_t(s64, UINT_MAX, freeblks);

Didn't I just got called out for using u* types?  The same applies
to s*, so use int64_t here to be consistent.

> +		/*
> +		 * NOTE: If your intent processing routine can create
> +		 * more deferred ops, you /must/ attach them to the
> +		 * dfops in this routine or else those subsequent
> +		 * intents will get replayed in the wrong order!
> +		 */

Please use up all available 80 characters for your comments.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux