On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:14:14AM +0100, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 2:27 AM, Darrick J. Wong
> <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > If two programs simultaneously try to write to the same part of a file
> > via direct IO and buffered IO, there's a chance that the post-diowrite
> > pagecache invalidation will fail on the dirty page. When this happens,
> > the dio write succeeded, which means that the page cache is no longer
> > coherent with the disk! Programs are not supposed to mix IO types and
> > this is a clear case of data corruption, so store an EIO which will be
> > reflected to userspace during the next fsync. Get rid of the WARN_ON
> > to assuage the fuzz-tester complaints.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > fs/iomap.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/iomap.c b/fs/iomap.c
> > index 5011a96..9f0e8d4 100644
> > --- a/fs/iomap.c
> > +++ b/fs/iomap.c
> > @@ -711,6 +711,19 @@ struct iomap_dio {
> > };
> > };
> >
> > +static void iomap_warn_stale_pagecache(struct inode *inode)
> > +{
> > + static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(_rs,
> > + DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL,
> > + DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST);
> > +
> > + errseq_set(&inode->i_mapping->wb_err, -EIO);
> > + if (__ratelimit(&_rs)) {
> > + pr_crit("Page cache invalidation failure on direct I/O. Possible data corruption due to collision with buffered I/O!\n");
> > + dump_stack_print_info(KERN_CRIT);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > static ssize_t iomap_dio_complete(struct iomap_dio *dio)
> > {
> > struct kiocb *iocb = dio->iocb;
> > @@ -753,7 +766,8 @@ static ssize_t iomap_dio_complete(struct iomap_dio *dio)
> > err = invalidate_inode_pages2_range(inode->i_mapping,
> > offset >> PAGE_SHIFT,
> > (offset + dio->size - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> > - WARN_ON_ONCE(err);
> > + if (err)
> > + iomap_warn_stale_pagecache(inode);
> > }
> >
> > inode_dio_end(file_inode(iocb->ki_filp));
> > @@ -1012,9 +1026,16 @@ iomap_dio_rw(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
> > if (ret)
> > goto out_free_dio;
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Try to invalidate cache pages for the range we're direct
> > + * writing. If this invalidation fails, tough, the write will
> > + * still work, but racing two incompatible write paths is a
> > + * pretty crazy thing to do, so we don't support it 100%.
> > + */
> > ret = invalidate_inode_pages2_range(mapping,
> > start >> PAGE_SHIFT, end >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> > - WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
> > + if (ret)
> > + iomap_warn_stale_pagecache(inode);
> > ret = 0;
> >
> > if (iov_iter_rw(iter) == WRITE && !is_sync_kiocb(iocb) &&
>
> Shouldn't the same be done for the non-iomap path as well?
> dio_complete() has a similar WARN_ON_ONCE().
Most probably yes, however the users of the old dio paths should decide
that. XFS moved to iomap a few releases ago for directio.
--D
> Thanks,
>
> Ilya
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
