On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 7:01 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 12:40:43AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Wednesday, November 15, 2017 12:07:30 AM CET Dave Chinner wrote: >> Can we stop here and be constructive going forward, please? > > Then let's stop this nonsense and get to work. > >> > > So what do you think should be done, specifically? >> > >> > Luis posted an initial version of those "use fs freeze" changes >> > recently, so Work with Luis to get those changes into the kernel. >> >> This isn't the first version as per the above and sorry, but without >> help from fs people this is going to end the same way as before and >> I sort of doubt that "working with Luis" alone is going to be sufficient. >> >> We need the fs people to actually help us, pretty much like back in 2011. > > Rafael, AFAICT the only outstanding issue with the patches I posted were > the last two patches. I haven't had time to re-test my patches without the > last patch, but if Chinner was right, and I suspect he was, then the last patch > is what implicated the need for the ext patch, which we don't want. So dropping > the last two patches I think would be a good starting point. > > I hope to have time to re-test this week, if you feel compelled to help, > you can also help test the patches except for the last two. Then if you > want to help further, helping iron out the kinks on the last patch would > be much appreciated. OK, please resend the series when you're ready. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
