Fix to check the correct value, and remove a duplicate handling of the
uneven record number split algorith,
Reported-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
---
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_iext_tree.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_iext_tree.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_iext_tree.c
index 00d660dcb05e..85d7f708eafc 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_iext_tree.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_iext_tree.c
@@ -555,16 +555,13 @@ xfs_iext_split_leaf(
int i;
/* for sequential append operations just spill over into the new node */
- if (cur->pos == KEYS_PER_NODE) {
+ if (cur->pos == RECS_PER_LEAF) {
cur->leaf = new;
cur->pos = 0;
*nr_entries = 0;
goto done;
}
- if (nr_keep & 1)
- nr_keep++;
-
for (i = 0; i < nr_move; i++) {
new->recs[i] = leaf->recs[nr_keep + i];
xfs_iext_rec_clear(&leaf->recs[nr_keep + i]);
--
2.14.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
