On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 12:14:48PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 12:30:22PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: > > > Yes, they're buggy since we shouldn't be interpreting directory entries > > > as a link target given that the zero bytes in the "link target" will > > > screw things up. > > > > Then I'm fine with taking it, and probably will edit the commit log a > > bit to reflect that we were missing a error case previously. Thanks! > > Darrick, can we add a note indicating what commit needs to be > backported to make the failure go away? Will do when the time comes. TBH we've not been consistent about marking regression tests with the appropriate upstream commit id once they're available. --D > - Ted > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
