On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 07:57:25PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 03:35:08PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > Do you see any secondary effects, such as increased slab fragmentation > > because of the extra kmem_allocs? In general I think this should be ok, > > I just worry slightly that whatever reason we had for having > > if_inline_data is still around and will blow up in weird ways if we get > > rid of it. > > Why would we get much slab fragmentation? The small slabs (16 or 32 > byte for those current users) have a huge turnover, so they generally > aren't a majr problem. I don't think they will be a serious problem either; this is just me wondering why we had if_inline_data in the first place (now that we're removing it). --D > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
