Re: [PATCH v9 0/6] MAP_DIRECT for DAX userspace flush

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 11:31:45AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> I don't think that really represents how lots of apps actually use
> RDMA.
> 
> RDMA is often buried down in the software stack (eg in a MPI), and by
> the time a mapping gets used for RDMA transfer the link between the
> FD, mmap and the MR is totally opaque.
> 
> Having a MR specific notification means the low level RDMA libraries
> have a chance to deal with everything for the app.
> 
> Eg consider a HPC app using MPI that uses some DAX aware library to
> get DAX backed mmap's. It then passes memory in those mmaps to the
> MPI library to do transfers. The MPI creates the MR on demand.
> 

I suspect one of the more interesting use cases might be a file server,
for which that's not the case.  But otherwise I agree with the above,
and also thing that notifying the MR handle is the only way to go for
another very important reason:  fencing.  What if the application/library
does not react on the notification?  With a per-MR notification we
can unregister the MR in kernel space and have a rock solid fencing
mechanism.  And that is the most important bit here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux