On Wed, 2017-10-04 at 02:47 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > 3) Lookup for kthreads which seem to generate IO -- address / review if > removal of the freezer API can be done somehow with a quescing. This > is currently for example being done on SCSI / md. > 4) Only after all the above is done should we consider this patch or some > form of it. After having given this more thought, I think we should omit these last two steps. Modifying the md driver such that it does not submit I/O requests while processes are frozen requires either to use the freezer API or to open-code it. I think there is general agreement in the kernel community that open-coding a single mechanism in multiple drivers is wrong. Does this mean that instead of removing the freezer API we should keep it and review all its users instead? Bart. ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{�����jg��������ݢj����G�������j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥