On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 08:36:50AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 05:13:59PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote: > > Currently only the blocksize is checked, but we should really be calling > > bdev_dax_supported() which also tests to make sure we can get a > > struct dax_device and that the dax_direct_access() path is working. > > > > This is the same check that we do for the "-o dax" mount option in > > xfs_fs_fill_super(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > > I think we just want to pick this up ASAP. And between my vague > memoried and that reviewed-by tag it already was part of a different > series, wasn't it? Yep, the first 2 patches were part of this series: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/7/552 which you reviewed. I included them in this series because the later patches needed to build on them. It looks like they are now in Darrick's xfs-4.14-fixes branch, but haven't yet made it upstream. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
