test case for "xfs: XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE() should be false if no rt device present"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: test case for "xfs: XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE() should be false if no rt device present"
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 07:51:11 -0700
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, fstests@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23)

Hi Richard,

can you send an xfstests test case for your XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE()
fix?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: test case for "xfs: XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE() should be false if no rt device present"
  - From: Richard Wareing

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] test race when checking i_size on direct i/o read
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 12/12] xfs: create a new buf_ops pointer to verify structure metadata
Previous by thread: io_submit() blocks for writes for substantial amount of time
Next by thread: Re: test case for "xfs: XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE() should be false if no rt device present"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Trails] [Linux Kernel] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux