Re: [PATCH] define __ prefixed version of intXY_t types

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 10:56:09AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 04:36:16PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> > This is required since musl does not define them
> > unlike glibc
> 
> [u]int*_t types are defined by the C99 standard and are supposed to
> be provided by stdint.h.  If musl is not providing stdint.h, then
> the C99 compliant compiler should be.

Sorry, ignore this, I read the defines the wrong way around. (more
coffee!)

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux