Re: [PATCH 8/9] xfs: disallow marking previously dirty buffers as ordered

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 11:05:56AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> Ordered buffers are used in situations where the buffer is not
> physically logged but must pass through the transaction/logging
> pipeline for a particular transaction. As a result, ordered buffers
> are not unpinned and written back until the transaction commits to
> the log. Ordered buffers have a strict requirement that the target
> buffer must not be currently dirty and resident in the log pipeline
> at the time it is marked ordered. If a dirty+ordered buffer is
> committed, the buffer is reinserted to the AIL but not physically
> relogged at the LSN of the associated checkpoint. The buffer log
> item is assigned the LSN of the latest checkpoint and the AIL
> effectively releases the previously logged buffer content from the
> active log before the buffer has been written back. If the tail
> pushes forward and a filesystem crash occurs while in this state, an
> inconsistent filesystem could result.
> 
> It is currently the caller responsibility to ensure an ordered
> buffer is not already dirty from a previous modification. This is
> unclear and error prone when not used in situations where it is
> guaranteed a buffer has not been previously modified (such as new
> metadata allocations).
> 
> To facilitate general purpose use of ordered buffers, update
> xfs_trans_ordered_buf() to conditionally order the buffer based on
> state of the log item and return the status of the result. If the
> bli is dirty, do not order the buffer and return false. The caller
> must either physically log the buffer (having acquired the
> appropriate log reservation) or push it from the AIL to clean it
> before it can be marked ordered in the current transaction.
> 
> Note that ordered buffers are currently only used in two situations:
> 1.) inode chunk allocation where previously logged buffers are not
> possible and 2.) extent swap which will be updated to handle ordered
> buffer failures in a separate patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h     | 2 +-
>  fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c | 7 +++++--
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h
> index b3632eb..4709823 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h
> @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ void		xfs_trans_bhold_release(xfs_trans_t *, struct xfs_buf *);
>  void		xfs_trans_binval(xfs_trans_t *, struct xfs_buf *);
>  void		xfs_trans_inode_buf(xfs_trans_t *, struct xfs_buf *);
>  void		xfs_trans_stale_inode_buf(xfs_trans_t *, struct xfs_buf *);
> -void		xfs_trans_ordered_buf(xfs_trans_t *, struct xfs_buf *);
> +bool		xfs_trans_ordered_buf(xfs_trans_t *, struct xfs_buf *);
>  void		xfs_trans_dquot_buf(xfs_trans_t *, struct xfs_buf *, uint);
>  void		xfs_trans_inode_alloc_buf(xfs_trans_t *, struct xfs_buf *);
>  void		xfs_trans_ichgtime(struct xfs_trans *, struct xfs_inode *, int);
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c
> index 3089e80..3ba7a96 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c
> @@ -724,7 +724,7 @@ xfs_trans_inode_alloc_buf(
>   * transactions rather than the physical changes we make to the buffer without
>   * changing writeback ordering constraints of metadata buffers.
>   */
> -void
> +bool
>  xfs_trans_ordered_buf(
>  	struct xfs_trans	*tp,
>  	struct xfs_buf		*bp)
> @@ -734,7 +734,9 @@ xfs_trans_ordered_buf(
>  	ASSERT(bp->b_transp == tp);
>  	ASSERT(bip != NULL);
>  	ASSERT(atomic_read(&bip->bli_refcount) > 0);
> -	ASSERT(!xfs_buf_item_dirty_format(bip));
> +
> +	if (xfs_buf_item_dirty_format(bip))
> +		return false;
>  
>  	bip->bli_flags |= XFS_BLI_ORDERED;
>  	trace_xfs_buf_item_ordered(bip);
> @@ -744,6 +746,7 @@ xfs_trans_ordered_buf(
>  	 * to be marked dirty and that it has been logged.
>  	 */
>  	xfs_trans_dirty_buf(tp, bp);
> +	return true;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> -- 
> 2.9.5
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux