[PATCH 2/9] xfs: remove unnecessary dirty bli format check for ordered bufs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



xfs_buf_item_unlock() historically checked the dirty state of the
buffer by manually checking the buffer log formats for dirty
segments. The introduction of ordered buffers invalidated this check
because ordered buffers have dirty bli's but no dirty (logged)
segments. The check was updated to accommodate ordered buffers by
looking at the bli state first and considering the blf only if the
bli is clean.

This logic is safe but unnecessary. There is no valid case where the
bli is clean yet the blf has dirty segments. The bli is set dirty
whenever the blf is logged (via xfs_trans_log_buf()) and the blf is
cleared in the only place BLI_DIRTY is cleared (xfs_trans_binval()).

Remove the conditional blf dirty checks and replace with an assert
that should catch any discrepencies between bli and blf dirty
states. Refactor the old blf dirty check into a helper function to
be used by the assert.

Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.h |  1 +
 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c
index cdae0ad5e0..9f4dbca 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c
@@ -575,8 +575,9 @@ xfs_buf_item_unlock(
 {
 	struct xfs_buf_log_item	*bip = BUF_ITEM(lip);
 	struct xfs_buf		*bp = bip->bli_buf;
-	bool			clean;
+	bool			dirty;
 	bool			aborted;
+	bool			ordered;
 	int			flags;
 
 	/* Clear the buffer's association with this transaction. */
@@ -620,20 +621,13 @@ xfs_buf_item_unlock(
 	 * regardless of whether it is dirty or not. A dirty abort implies a
 	 * shutdown, anyway.
 	 *
-	 * Ordered buffers are dirty but may have no recorded changes, so ensure
-	 * we only release clean items here.
+	 * The bli dirty state should match whether the blf has logged segments
+	 * except for ordered buffers, where only the bli should be dirty.
 	 */
-	clean = (flags & XFS_BLI_DIRTY) ? false : true;
-	if (clean) {
-		int i;
-		for (i = 0; i < bip->bli_format_count; i++) {
-			if (!xfs_bitmap_empty(bip->bli_formats[i].blf_data_map,
-				     bip->bli_formats[i].blf_map_size)) {
-				clean = false;
-				break;
-			}
-		}
-	}
+	dirty = (flags & XFS_BLI_DIRTY) ? true : false;
+	ordered = (flags & XFS_BLI_ORDERED) ? true : false;
+	ASSERT((!ordered && dirty == xfs_buf_item_dirty_format(bip)) ||
+	       (ordered && dirty && !xfs_buf_item_dirty_format(bip)));
 
 	/*
 	 * Clean buffers, by definition, cannot be in the AIL. However, aborted
@@ -652,7 +646,7 @@ xfs_buf_item_unlock(
 			ASSERT(XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(lip->li_mountp));
 			xfs_trans_ail_remove(lip, SHUTDOWN_LOG_IO_ERROR);
 			xfs_buf_item_relse(bp);
-		} else if (clean)
+		} else if (!dirty)
 			xfs_buf_item_relse(bp);
 	}
 
@@ -945,6 +939,28 @@ xfs_buf_item_log(
 }
 
 
+/*
+ * Return true if the buffer has any ranges logged/dirtied by a transaction,
+ * false otherwise.
+ */
+bool
+xfs_buf_item_dirty_format(
+	struct xfs_buf_log_item	*bip)
+{
+	int			i;
+	bool			dirty = false;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < bip->bli_format_count; i++) {
+		if (!xfs_bitmap_empty(bip->bli_formats[i].blf_data_map,
+			     bip->bli_formats[i].blf_map_size)) {
+			dirty = true;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return dirty;
+}
+
 STATIC void
 xfs_buf_item_free(
 	xfs_buf_log_item_t	*bip)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.h
index e0e744a..9690ce6 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.h
@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ typedef struct xfs_buf_log_item {
 int	xfs_buf_item_init(struct xfs_buf *, struct xfs_mount *);
 void	xfs_buf_item_relse(struct xfs_buf *);
 void	xfs_buf_item_log(xfs_buf_log_item_t *, uint, uint);
+bool	xfs_buf_item_dirty_format(struct xfs_buf_log_item *);
 void	xfs_buf_attach_iodone(struct xfs_buf *,
 			      void(*)(struct xfs_buf *, xfs_log_item_t *),
 			      xfs_log_item_t *);
-- 
2.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux