Re: [PATCH v8 17/18] xfs: minimal conversion to errseq_t writeback error reporting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 07:12 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Nice and simple, this looks great!
> 
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

Thanks! I think this turned out to be a lot cleaner too.

For filesystems that use filemap_write_and_wait_range today this now
becomes a pretty straight conversion to file_write_and_wait_range -- one
liner patches for the most part.

I've started rolling patches to do that, but now I'm wondering...

Should I aim to do that with an individual patch for each fs, or is it
better to do a swath of them all at once in a single patch here?
-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux