I waxed a little loquacious here, but I figured that more detail was
better, and writeback error handling is so hard to get right.
Although I think we'll eventually remove it once the transition is
complete, I've gone ahead and documented the FS_WB_ERRSEQ flag as well.
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt
index f42b90687d40..c3efdd833a3d 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt
@@ -576,7 +576,49 @@ should clear PG_Dirty and set PG_Writeback. It can be actually
written at any point after PG_Dirty is clear. Once it is known to be
safe, PG_Writeback is cleared.
-Writeback makes use of a writeback_control structure...
+Writeback makes use of a writeback_control structure to direct the
+operations. This gives the the writepage and writepages operations some
+information about the nature of and reason for the writeback request,
+and the constraints under which it is being done. It is also used to
+return information back to the caller about the result of a writepage or
+writepages request.
+
+Handling errors during writeback
+--------------------------------
+Most applications that utilize the pagecache will periodically call
+fsync to ensure that data written has made it to the backing store.
+When there is an error during writeback, expect that error to be
+reported when fsync is called. After an error has been reported to
+fsync, subsequent fsync calls on the same file descriptor should return
+0, unless further writeback errors have occurred since the previous
+fsync.
+
+Ideally, the kernel would report an error only on file descriptions on
+which writes were done that subsequently failed to be written back. The
+generic pagecache infrastructure does not track the file descriptions
+that have dirtied each individual page however, so determining which
+file descriptors should get back an error is not possible.
+
+Instead, the generic writeback error tracking infrastructure in the
+kernel settles for reporting errors to fsync on all file descriptions
+that were open at the time that the error occurred. In a situation with
+multiple writers, all of them will get back an error on a subsequent fsync,
+even if all of the writes done through that particular file descriptor
+succeeded (or even if there were no writes on that file descriptor at all).
+
+Filesystems that wish to use this infrastructure should call
+filemap_set_wb_err to record the error in the address_space when it
+occurs. Then, at the end of their fsync operation, they should call
+filemap_report_wb_err to ensure that the struct file's error cursor
+has advanced to the correct point in the stream of errors emitted by
+the backing device(s).
+
+Older kernels used a different method for tracking errors, based on flags
+in the address_space. We're currently switching everything over to use
+the infrastructure based on errseq_t values. During the transition,
+filesystem authors will want to also ensure their file_system_type has
+FS_WB_ERRSEQ set in fs_flags to ensure that shared infrastructure is
+aware of the model in use.
struct address_space_operations
-------------------------------
@@ -804,7 +846,8 @@ struct address_space_operations {
The File Object
===============
-A file object represents a file opened by a process.
+A file object represents a file opened by a process. This is also known
+as an "open file description" in POSIX parlance.
struct file_operations
@@ -887,7 +930,8 @@ otherwise noted.
release: called when the last reference to an open file is closed
- fsync: called by the fsync(2) system call
+ fsync: called by the fsync(2) system call. Also see the section above
+ entitled "Handling errors during writeback".
fasync: called by the fcntl(2) system call when asynchronous
(non-blocking) mode is enabled for a file
--
2.13.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
