On 5/8/17 2:47 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Introduce a new ioctl that uses the reverse mapping btree to return > information about the physical layout of the filesystem. > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > configure.ac | 1 > include/builddefs.in | 7 +++ > include/linux.h | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ So, I'm torn about whether we should be adding all the fsmap definitions into xfsprogs. (I know... I did it for statx; I'm wondering if that was a bad precedent, and/or if it being a syscall makes it a different situation...). I don't know when we ever deprecate or remove this stuff. If you use packaged kernels, you'll get updated headers pretty quickly, right, or on a devel box you might install your own? Not trying to be difficult, just trying to make sure we have a consistent plan for new interfaces like this... Thanks, -Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html