On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:15:51PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: >> > +static inline int uuid_cmp(const uuid_t u1, const uuid_t u2) >> > { >> > - return memcmp(&u1, &u2, sizeof(uuid_be)); >> > + return memcmp(&u1, &u2, sizeof(uuid_t)); >> > } >> > >> >> >> I think we should use this opportunity to change these to (uuid_t *, uuid_t *) >> which is more in line with the rest of the helpers including the new helpers >> hoisted from xfs. > > Or just kill them off - uuid/guid_equals is the better interface for all > existing users as far as I can tell. My updated series already kills > off the be/uuid one, the le/guid one will need a bit more work, though. That works too. and for another argument, why need a helper uuid/guid_cmp when one can use C comparison (i.e. u1 != u2) ? assuming that we have no reason to abstract that fact that uuid_t/guid_t are a struct type. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html