Re: [PATCH 1/8] Use RWF_* flags for AIO operations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please add subsystem prefixes to your subject lines, e.g.

fs:

for all the generic fs ones,

xfs:

for XFS,

block:

for block layer changes, etc.

>  
> -	if (flags & ~(RWF_HIPRI | RWF_DSYNC | RWF_SYNC))
> -		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> -
>  	init_sync_kiocb(&kiocb, filp);
> -	if (flags & RWF_HIPRI)
> -		kiocb.ki_flags |= IOCB_HIPRI;
> -	if (flags & RWF_DSYNC)
> -		kiocb.ki_flags |= IOCB_DSYNC;
> -	if (flags & RWF_SYNC)
> -		kiocb.ki_flags |= (IOCB_DSYNC | IOCB_SYNC);
> +	ret = kiocb_set_rw_flags(&kiocb, flags);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;

And please split factoring out kiocb_set_rw_flags into a separate
prep patch.

Otherwise these changes look fine:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux