On 4/25/17 9:02 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:20:34AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> On 4/23/17 1:54 PM, Jan Tulak wrote: >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> I decided to split my big patchset into more smaller ones. So, this is the >>> first set. It adds set/get functions similar to Dave's suggestion, to save and >>> retrieve user values to and from the big opts table and prepares the ground for >>> future patches. >>> >>> >>> It is a mix of patches I already submitted and new ones: >>> Patches 2, 3, 4, 5 are just slightly modified to fix their issues. >>> Other patches are new. >>> >>> The last few patches could be merged into one, because it should only >>> substitute variables for get/set calls, but because there are so many >>> places where the changes occurs, I split them into smaller chunks, >>> making it (hopefully) easier for you to review. >>> >>> This patchset requires my two previous uint patches. >> >> Just to be clear, those were NAK'd, I believe, so these may need >> to be rebased without them. > > I checked and I see concerns for the data types used expressed but from > what I can tell Jan addressed these concerns and followed up with > subsequent patches. Perhaps it was not clear given he only respun one > of the patches multiple times. I apologize - somehow I missed the re-submission. I'll take a look. -Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
