On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 08:54:57PM +0200, Jan Tulak wrote:
> Add functions that can be used to get/set values to opts table.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Tulak <jtulak@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
> mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c b/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c
> index c2ffd91..4caf93c 100644
> --- a/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c
> +++ b/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c
> @@ -786,6 +786,38 @@ get_conf_raw(int opt, int subopt)
> return opts[opt].subopt_params[subopt].raw_input;
> }
>
> +static uint64_t getnum(const char *str, struct opt_params *opts, int index);
Why not just move getnum() above here. Forward declarations IMHO should not be
needed unless we have odd inclusion issues and I don't think that's the case
here ?
> +
> +/*
> + * Get and set values to the opts table.
> + */
> +static inline uint64_t
> +get_conf_val(int opt, int subopt)
> +{
> + return opts[opt].subopt_params[subopt].value;
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +set_conf_val(int opt, int subopt, uint64_t val)
> +{
> + struct subopt_param *sp = &opts[opt].subopt_params[subopt];
> +
> + sp->value = val;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * A wrapper for getnum and set_conf_val.
> + */
> +static inline uint64_t
> +parse_conf_val(int opt, int subopt, char *value)
> +{
> + uint64_t num = getnum(value, &opts[opt], subopt);
> +
> + set_conf_val(opt, subopt, num);
> + return num;
> +}
Very nice thanks!
Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
