On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 05:30:24PM +0200, Jan Tulak wrote: > Followup of my "[xfsprogs] Do we need so many data types for user input?" email. > This version has bool for flags and uses PRIu64 for printing 64bit values. > > Other issues from RFC, that I didn't get a satisfactory feedback to: > * __uint64_t is used because it is declared in xfsprogs, so unless there is a > reason to not use it (e.g. the declared type is just for some special use, > or is obsolete), I'm sticking to it. uint64_t is a standard C99 type. Please use it over an internal type that we plan to get rid of. i.e. http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2016-01/msg00386.html These patches were never finalised/finished because of conflicts with all the COW work that was pending at the time. This type conversion still needs to be picked up and finished... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
