Re: transaction reservations for deleting of shared extents

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I think the problem is that t_log_res just contains the log reservation
when the transaction was created.  But each item processed by
xfs_defer_finish uses up some of it, but in some cases these might
be different operations and not just more refcount updates, e.g. for
xfs_itruncate_extents which I see the issues with we mix EFI/EFD
items with refcount updates.

I still don't have a good idea how to fix this, though.  One idea
would be to prevent mixing different items, but I think being able
to mix them was one of your goals with the defer infrastructure rewrite.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux