Re: [PATCH 2/4] xfstests: Add first statx test [ver #10]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eryu Guan <eguan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Perhaps we should add a new autoconf rule in configure.ac and define
> HAVE_STATX if there's statx support, like what src/renameat2.c does?

The problem with that is that statx doesn't yet exist in glibc, so the tests
are going to be skipped.  I can define __NR_statx only on arches for which we
have a number and make xfstests_statx() give ENOSYS if __NR_statx isn't
defined.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux