Re: [PATCH v3] xfs: Honor FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE when punching ends of files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 10:15:31AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 09:18:00PM -0700, Calvin Owens wrote:
> > When punching past EOF on XFS, fallocate(mode=PUNCH_HOLE|KEEP_SIZE) will
> > round the file size up to the nearest multiple of PAGE_SIZE:
> > 
> >   calvinow@vm-disks/generic-xfs-1 ~$ dd if=/dev/urandom of=test bs=2048 count=1
> >   calvinow@vm-disks/generic-xfs-1 ~$ stat test
> >     Size: 2048            Blocks: 8          IO Block: 4096   regular file
> >   calvinow@vm-disks/generic-xfs-1 ~$ fallocate -n -l 2048 -o 2048 -p test
> >   calvinow@vm-disks/generic-xfs-1 ~$ stat test
> >     Size: 4096            Blocks: 8          IO Block: 4096   regular file
> > 
> > Commit 3c2bdc912a1cc050 ("xfs: kill xfs_zero_remaining_bytes") replaced
> > xfs_zero_remaining_bytes() with calls to iomap helpers. The new helpers
> > don't enforce that [pos,offset) lies strictly on [0,i_size) when being
> > called from xfs_free_file_space(), so by "leaking" these ranges into
> > xfs_zero_range() we get this buggy behavior.
> > 
> > Fix this by reintroducing the checks xfs_zero_remaining_bytes() did
> > against i_size at the bottom of xfs_free_file_space().
> > 
> > Reported-by: Aaron Gao <gzh@xxxxxx>
> > Fixes: 3c2bdc912a1cc050 ("xfs: kill xfs_zero_remaining_bytes")
> > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> > Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 4.8+
> > Signed-off-by: Calvin Owens <calvinowens@xxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c | 10 +++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
> > index 8b75dce..828532c 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
> > @@ -1311,8 +1311,16 @@ xfs_free_file_space(
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Now that we've unmap all full blocks we'll have to zero out any
> >  	 * partial block at the beginning and/or end.  xfs_zero_range is
> > -	 * smart enough to skip any holes, including those we just created.
> > +	 * smart enough to skip any holes, including those we just created,
> > +	 * but we must take care not to zero beyond EOF and enlarge i_size.
> >  	 */
> > +
> > +	if (offset >= XFS_ISIZE(ip))
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	if (offset + len > XFS_ISIZE(ip))
> > +		len = XFS_ISIZE(ip) - offset;
> > +
> 
> I'll pick this up for 4.12.

Bah, hit send too quickly.

I'll pick this up for 4.12, unless anyone wants me to push this for -rc6?

--D

> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> --D
> 
> >  	return xfs_zero_range(ip, offset, len, NULL);
> >  }
> >  
> > -- 
> > 2.9.3
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux