Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: move the inline directory verifiers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 09:38:36AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 09:28:17AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 09:24:31AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > I think xfs/348 causes -rc4 to fall over if CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG=y due to
> > > the XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_RETURNs that shouldn't be there.
> > 
> > Yes, that's the one.  How are we going to fix that for -rc5?
> 
> This patch fixes all the thinkos in the original patch, so I was just
> going to send it to Linus for rc5, but decided to poll the ML to see if
> anyone had an objection to that.

That's what I thought and was surprised by the reply from Dave..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux