Re: [PATCH] xfs_io: changes to statx interface [ver #2]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Running "compare" tests like this is not a function that xfs_io
> should perform. Have it run and output the statx information,
> and use xfstests to compare that against a golden output and/or
> the output of the xfs_io stat command.

A golden output that covers timestamps isn't possible.

Also comparing the output of Eric's statx command with the output of the stat
command as it stands isn't practical.  I guess I can add another parameter to
the stat command to produce something that looks the same.

I'm tempted to write C-based python3 module that gives raw access to the
system calls (something I want for the unionmount testsuite) and then script
this in python.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux