I am (literally) in the woods this week so can't really comment at length, but generally: xfs_io is useful to facilitate testing at times, but usually doesn't have tests built into the tool itself. And I think you are right that it is a poor fit for some of the testing you'd like to do. There is a src/ dir in xfstests for specialized C tests which get called by the test harness; that might also be a reasonable option. Thanks, Eric > On Mar 28, 2017, at 9:41 AM, David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Note that the intention is to put the testing of the syscall parameter > handling into LTP, along with testing of the symlink following and dirfd usage > since xfstests seems unsuitable for this. > > David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
