Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ltp is a trainwreck. Please send xfstests test like for all other file > system functionality. You're really trying to make it as hard as > possible for fs developers, don't you? Sorry, Christoph, but, in my opinion, xfstests is in worse shape than LTP. It's not self-contained (the code to make statx available seems to have to be added to xfsprogs) and it's practically undocumented. LTP, on the other hand, is pretty easy to modify. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
