On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 08:47:38AM -0700, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> "xfs_iread: validation failed for inode 96 failed"
>
> One "failed" seems like enough.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Yo dawg, I heard you like failed so I put failed in your
> failed so you can fail while you fail.
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Will queue for 4.12.
--D
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c
> index d93f9d9..09c3d1a 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c
> @@ -508,7 +508,7 @@
>
> /* even unallocated inodes are verified */
> if (!xfs_dinode_verify(mp, ip->i_ino, dip)) {
> - xfs_alert(mp, "%s: validation failed for inode %lld failed",
> + xfs_alert(mp, "%s: validation failed for inode %lld",
> __func__, ip->i_ino);
>
> XFS_CORRUPTION_ERROR(__func__, XFS_ERRLEVEL_LOW, mp, dip);
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
