Re: [PATCH] xfstests: xfs/191 update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 03:49:41PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 05:33:47PM +0100, Jan Tulak wrote:
> > The removed 'do_mkfs_pass -l size=4096b' was against man page
> > (-b section). Other entries are things that weren't covered before.
> > 
> > Specifically, a standalone "-l size=4096b" should fail, because:
> > To  specify any options on the command line in units of filesys‐
> > tem blocks, this option must be  specified  first  so  that  the
> > filesystem block size is applied consistently to all options.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Tulak <jtulak@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> This looks fine to me. But I'd like some reviews from xfs developers
> too. (cc'd linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx).
> 

So has mkfs been fixed to cause '-l size=4096b' to fail? I'm not sure we
should cause the test to fail until/unless the mkfs behavior is fixed
up.

Brian

> Thanks,
> Eryu
> 
> > ---
> >  tests/xfs/191-input-validation | 11 ++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tests/xfs/191-input-validation b/tests/xfs/191-input-validation
> > index 5de55170..e22f9bfc 100755
> > --- a/tests/xfs/191-input-validation
> > +++ b/tests/xfs/191-input-validation
> > @@ -114,6 +114,9 @@ do_mkfs_fail -d sectsize=2foo $SCRATCH_DEV
> >  do_mkfs_fail -l sectsize=nggh $SCRATCH_DEV
> >  do_mkfs_fail -l sectsize=2nggh $SCRATCH_DEV
> >  
> > +# option respecification should fail
> > +do_mkfs_fail -d agcount=32,agcount=32 $SCRATCH_DEV
> > +
> >  # conflicting sector/block sizes
> >  do_mkfs_fail -s size=512 -d sectsize=1024 $SCRATCH_DEV
> >  do_mkfs_fail -s size=512 -l sectsize=1024 $SCRATCH_DEV
> > @@ -191,6 +194,12 @@ do_mkfs_fail -d sectsize=512s,agsize=65536s $SCRATCH_DEV
> >  
> >  reset_fsimg
> >  
> > +# some sectsize/blocksize combinations
> > +do_mkfs_pass -s size=512 -b size=8s $SCRATCH_DEV
> > +do_mkfs_fail -s size=512s $SCRATCH_DEV
> > +
> > +reset_fsimg
> > +
> >  # file section, should pass
> >  do_mkfs_pass $fsimg
> >  do_mkfs_pass -d file=0 $SCRATCH_DEV
> > @@ -218,7 +227,6 @@ reset_fsimg
> >  # log section, should pass
> >  do_mkfs_pass -l size=$logsize -d size=$fssize $SCRATCH_DEV
> >  do_mkfs_pass -l agnum=2 $SCRATCH_DEV
> > -do_mkfs_pass -l size=4096b $SCRATCH_DEV
> >  do_mkfs_pass -l sectsize=512 $SCRATCH_DEV
> >  do_mkfs_pass -l sunit=64 $SCRATCH_DEV
> >  do_mkfs_pass -l sunit=64 -d sunit=8,swidth=8 $SCRATCH_DEV
> > @@ -237,6 +245,7 @@ do_mkfs_pass -l version=2 -m crc=0 $SCRATCH_DEV
> >  do_mkfs_pass -l version=2 $SCRATCH_DEV
> >  
> >  # log section, should fail
> > +do_mkfs_fail -l size=4096b $SCRATCH_DEV
> >  do_mkfs_fail -l size=${fssize}b $SCRATCH_DEV
> >  do_mkfs_fail -l size=${fssize}s $SCRATCH_DEV
> >  do_mkfs_fail -l size=${fssize}yerk $SCRATCH_DEV
> > -- 
> > 2.11.0
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux