Re: [PATCH 00/22] mkfs.xfs: Make stronger conflict checks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 12:38 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:59:55PM +0100, Jan Tulak wrote:
>> This set is a follow-up of some old discussions and further attempts to untangle
>> the spaghetti in options parsing. In short, this patchset allows to define
>> cross-option conflicts and makes the conflicts detection more robust.
>
> This series is pretty large. There are quite a bit of patches which just rename
> something, or just shove code from one place to another. Can you group up
> non-functional changes together first, and send a small series of simple stuff
> with no functional changes first?
>
> That should reduce the size of the functional patch set, and make it clearer
> which patches require much careful eyeballing. It should also put out of your
> queue tons of changes which are trivial and can go in rather sooner.
>

I see... I will see how I can split it better. I guess not everything
can be moved like this, but at least some changes can be moved.

>> Config file patches addendum:
>>
>> (Thread: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-xfs/msg04703.html)
>>
>> I read through the changes, but decided to don't take anything from it.
>
> The last 2 patches of my config series are really the functional change there,
> the rest is fluff to account for the insanity we have now.
>
>> I think it is time to do something and adding further changes would just
>> push it down again. Nevertheless, the other patchset contains some changes
>> (like splitting the main opts loop) that I wanted to add in some later patch
>> too.
>
> OK.
>
>> I suggest that we first merge these patches I'm sending, and once it solves
>> some of the issues Luis hit too, we can look again on the config file thing
>> and even if the main idea fell out of favor for some reason, there are still
>> other useful changes.
>
> Sure, I'm fine with this, do you have a git tree ? Once you rev and post new
> series if you can provide a git URL that'd be great as then I can just work
> off of that.
>
>> PS: I'm traveling at Vault next week, so if you are there too, we can open it
>> there.
>
> I'm up for beers there.
>

Great. :-)

Cheers,
Jan



-- 
Jan Tulak
jtulak@xxxxxxxxxx / jan@xxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux