Hi Jeff, On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 04:35:59PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > I was doing an xfstests run on xfs with v4.11.0-rc1, and these two > warnings popped. Looks like invalidate_inode_pages2_range failed? A > small patch to print the error there showed that it was returning > -EBUSY. > > Pretty easy to reproduce by running xfstests generic/095 on a KVM guest > running v4.11.0-rc1. > > [ 591.302422] run fstests generic/095 at 2017-03-07 15:38:32 > [ 591.452226] XFS (vda6): Unmounting Filesystem > [ 591.825895] XFS (vda6): Mounting V5 Filesystem > [ 591.841560] XFS (vda6): Ending clean mount > [ 592.127155] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > [ 592.133775] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 20539 at fs/iomap.c:954 iomap_dio_rw+0x39a/0x3b0 and > [ 592.202828] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 20540 at fs/iomap.c:896 iomap_dio_rw+0x1b1/0x3b0 IIRC, these warnings are kind of "known issue", they're filtered out by generic/095 and should not cause the test to fail. You can check the comments before filter_xfs_dmesg() function in generic/095 test. Did generic/095 fail for you due to dmesg check? If so I think there might be an fstests bug. My generic/095 run on 4.11-rc1 kernel triggered these warnings too, but test itself didn't report failure. Thanks, Eryu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
