Re: [PATCH] xfs: clear delalloc and cache on buffered write failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 02:56:39PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 08:46:27AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> > commit fa7f138ac4c70dc00519c124cf7cd4862a0a5b0e upstream.
> > 
> > The buffered write failure handling code in
> > xfs_file_iomap_end_delalloc() has a couple minor problems. First, if
> > written == 0, start_fsb is not rounded down and it fails to kill off a
> > delalloc block if the start offset is block unaligned. This results in a
> > lingering delalloc block and broken delalloc block accounting detected
> > at unmount time. Fix this by rounding down start_fsb in the unlikely
> > event that written == 0.
> > 
> > Second, it is possible for a failed overwrite of a delalloc extent to
> > leave dirty pagecache around over a hole in the file. This is because is
> > possible to hit ->iomap_end() on write failure before the iomap code has
> > attempted to allocate pagecache, and thus has no need to clean it up. If
> > the targeted delalloc extent was successfully written by a previous
> > write, however, then it does still have dirty pages when ->iomap_end()
> > punches out the underlying blocks. This ultimately results in writeback
> > over a hole. To fix this problem, unconditionally punch out the
> > pagecache from XFS before the associated delalloc range.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v4.8+
> > ---
> > 
> > This is for stable... it fixes a latent regression exposed by
> > d1908f52557b ("fs: break out of iomap_file_buffered_write on fatal
> > signals"), which is to be backported to 4.8+ stable kernels.
> 
> For XFS patches, I need an explicit ack from the maintainer before
> applying them, as per their instructions in the past...

"ACK", FWIW.

(XFS is slowly moving towards group maintainership amongst the most
active contributors, or at least "don't lets dump all the responsibility
on Dave" maintainership.)

--D

> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux