On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 05:43:56PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > Hmmmm. refcountbt updates should all be processed as deferred ops, > which means that each logical update ("increase refcount of blocks > 3-300") should be getting its own transaction. Yes, but we'd still need to figure out how much to allocate for that transaction. > The function xfs_refcount_still_have_space tries to guess when we're > getting close to using up all the log reservation by assuming that each > refcount update will eventually use 32 bytes of the transaction > reservation, though it's hard to know precisely what the results of > formatting the log items will be. I guess it's getting that estimate wrong. It's also pretty weird and different from how we reserve space for transactions everywhere else in XFS.. > When it thinks we're out of transaction space it'll signal a partial > completion, which (should) cause the defer_ops mechanism to log an RUD > and a new RUI, then roll the transaction and start again. I speculate > that my guess of 32 bytes per refcountbt update is not correct. :( > > Can you reproduce it easily? IIRC xfs/140 should exercise some of this > mechanism. I personally can't reproduce it easily, but there is a QA setup that reproduces it reliably, although it takes quite some time. I think I can send you the reproducer, but it might require the right hardware to hit the race, given that I can't actually reproduce it. > > --D ---end quoted text--- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html