On 02/16/2017 08:42 AM, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 02/15/2017 12:31 PM, Dave Jiang wrote: >> The fix introduced by e4decc90 to fix the UP case for 32bit x86, however >> that broke the SMP case that was working previously. Add ifdef so the dummy >> function only show up for 32bit UP case only. > > Could you elaborate a bit on how it broke things? So originally 0-day build found that commit a10a1701 (mm, x86: add support for PUD-sized transparent hugepages) is breaking 32bit x86 UP config because native_pud_clear() was missing to satisfy arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h. I added a dummy function to satisfy that with commit e4decc90 (mm,x86: native_pud_clear missing on i386 build). However in the process of doing that, I broke the 32bit x86 SMP config that was working before. > >> Fix: e4decc90 mm,x86: native_pud_clear missing on i386 build > > Which tree is that in, btw? > linux-next-20170214 I believe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html