Re: [PATCH 3/5] xfs: improve handling of busy extents in the low-level allocator

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 01:51:49PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > So instead we add a new waitqueue and a generation counter to the pag
> > structure so that we can do wakeups once we've removed busy extents,
> > and we replace the single retry with an unconditional one - after
> > all we hold the AGF buffer lock, so no other allocations or frees
> > can be racing with us in this AG.
> 
> Um... is this patch supposed to be merged with the previous one?
> They have the same subject/commit message.

It is - but git rebase keeps duplicating patches when you try to fold
a patch into the previous one and there is any kind of conflict.  In
that case it needs another pass to really fold it which I missed for
this series.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux