Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs/263: don't hardcode inode numbers in output

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 12:30:12PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 12:10:56PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > On 1/28/17 11:38 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > Since we can't control the inode number assignments when creating files,
> > > don't hardcode them in the golden output.
> > 
> > what numbers are you seeing?
> > 
> > The inode numbers aren't important for the test, but I don't want to
> > gloss over something unexpected.
> 
> I consistently see 131+64 = 195 and things like that.

I occasionally see 195/6 inode numbers too, I suspect it has something
to do with 4k-sector disks. Test failed if I point SCRATCH_DEV to a
4k-sector scsi_debug device, and test passed after applying this patch.

Thanks,
Eryu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux