Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] xfs: test malformed inode mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 03:30:22PM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> Eryu,
> 
> This is the 3rd revision of the malformed inode mode test.
> 
> Like with v2, patch 1 is safe and it passes on kernel 4.9.
> 
> Like with v2, patch 2 is safe, but unlike v2, it fails on
> kernel 4.9, because I added a stronger expectation for the
> test to fails on stat of directory with inode size 0.
> 
> Like with v2, patch 3 triggers an XFS assert and I removed
> the "safety pin" that was there in v2.
> 
> I already sent the fix patch to Darick, which addresses the
> failures in both patch 2 and 3.
> 
> You could merge patch 1 now and defer merging patches 2-3
> or you could wait with merging the entire test. up to you.

I'll merge patch 2-3 in this week update, Darrick has sent the fixes to
Linus, hopefully they'll be in rc5 next week.

Thanks,
Eryu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux