On 1/14/17 6:53 AM, Brian Foster wrote: >> I do think that mere mortal invocations via xfs_admin need to be >> handled in this "ignore agcount" case, though... >> > We're talking about invocations intended to modify things (i.e., version > flags, fs uuid, etc.), right? If so, wouldn't we want those things to > fail if the superblock is busted? Yes - I'm saying that if xfs_db continues with only 1 ag, those tools will not work as expected. (they normally modify all superblocks). setting exitcode to 1 in the corrupted agcount case would allow xfs_admin to return failure as well, for example. -Eric > Brian > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
