Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfs: fix bogus minleft manipulations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > Yes.  And I actually had that in a previous iteration, and it got
> > dropped at some point.
> 
> I see the diff hunk in question hasn't changed in the v2 patchset...
> Did Dave's suggestion not work?

We don't need it anymore.  The previous iteration set minleft to the
worst case indirect blocks for the requested extent length.  This series
instead sticks to the old minleft value for just a single extent
allocation and thus doesn't need the fallback as the minleft value
can't get any smaller.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux