On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 06:53:31PM +0100, Carlos Maiolino wrote: > max_retries _show and _store functions should test against cfg->max_retries, > not cfg->retry_timeout > > Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c > index 276d302..de6195e 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c > @@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ max_retries_show( > int retries; > struct xfs_error_cfg *cfg = to_error_cfg(kobject); > > - if (cfg->retry_timeout == XFS_ERR_RETRY_FOREVER) > + if (cfg->max_retries == XFS_ERR_RETRY_FOREVER) > retries = -1; > else > retries = cfg->max_retries; > @@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ max_retries_store( > return -EINVAL; > > if (val == -1) > - cfg->retry_timeout = XFS_ERR_RETRY_FOREVER; > + cfg->max_retries = XFS_ERR_RETRY_FOREVER; Applied, thanks. --D > else > cfg->max_retries = val; > return count; > -- > 2.9.3 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
