[PATCH 2/5] xfs: fix the alignment fallback in xfs_bmap_btalloc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The way the alignment field is used the minimum possible alignment is 1.
By setting it to 0 we'll mess up calculations that rely on this.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
---
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
index 2760bc3..19c05e9 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
@@ -3796,7 +3796,7 @@ xfs_bmap_btalloc(
 		 */
 		args.type = atype;
 		args.fsbno = ap->blkno;
-		args.alignment = 0;
+		args.alignment = 1;
 		if ((error = xfs_alloc_vextent(&args)))
 			return error;
 	}
-- 
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux