On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 09:56:45AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > Since a zero-length dedupe operation is guaranteed to succeed, use that > to test whether or not this filesystem supports dedupe. > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > file_scan.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/file_scan.c b/file_scan.c > index 617f166..a34453e 100644 > --- a/file_scan.c > +++ b/file_scan.c > @@ -45,11 +45,7 @@ > #include "file_scan.h" > #include "dbfile.h" > #include "util.h" > - > -/* This is not in linux/magic.h */ > -#ifndef XFS_SB_MAGIC > -#define XFS_SB_MAGIC 0x58465342 /* 'XFSB' */ > -#endif > +#include "btrfs-ioctl.h" > > static char path[PATH_MAX] = { 0, }; > static char *pathp = path; > @@ -189,6 +185,39 @@ static int walk_dir(const char *name) > return ret; > } > > +struct fake_btrfs_ioctl_same_args { > + struct btrfs_ioctl_same_args args; > + struct btrfs_ioctl_same_extent_info info; > +}; Why does this need a fake structure here? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html