Re: [PATCH, RFC] xfs: take indirect blocks into accounting when selecting an AG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] xfs: take indirect blocks into accounting when selecting an AG
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 17:42:36 +0100
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20161210061641.GQ29149@eguan.usersys.redhat.com>
References: <1481303709-12632-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <20161210061641.GQ29149@eguan.usersys.redhat.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

Btw, is this on 4.9-rc or for-next?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH, RFC] xfs: take indirect blocks into accounting when selecting an AG
  - From: Eryu Guan

References:
- [PATCH, RFC] xfs: take indirect blocks into accounting when selecting an AG
  - From: Christoph Hellwig
- Re: [PATCH, RFC] xfs: take indirect blocks into accounting when selecting an AG
  - From: Eryu Guan

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH, RFC] xfs: take indirect blocks into accounting when selecting an AG
Next by Date: Re: [RFC] Preparing for XFS reflink D-day
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH, RFC] xfs: take indirect blocks into accounting when selecting an AG
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH, RFC] xfs: take indirect blocks into accounting when selecting an AG
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Trails] [Linux Kernel] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux