From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxx>
This just makes the following patch cleaner.
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 33 ++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
index 7acbd2c..e23f945 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
@@ -3124,26 +3124,27 @@ static int btrfs_extent_same(struct inode *src, u64 loff, u64 olen,
int ret;
u64 len = olen;
struct cmp_pages cmp;
- int same_inode = 0;
+ bool same_inode = (src == dst);
u64 same_lock_start = 0;
u64 same_lock_len = 0;
- if (src == dst)
- same_inode = 1;
-
if (len == 0)
return 0;
- if (same_inode) {
+ if (same_inode)
inode_lock(src);
+ else
+ btrfs_double_inode_lock(src, dst);
- ret = extent_same_check_offsets(src, loff, &len, olen);
- if (ret)
- goto out_unlock;
- ret = extent_same_check_offsets(src, dst_loff, &len, olen);
- if (ret)
- goto out_unlock;
+ ret = extent_same_check_offsets(src, loff, &len, olen);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out_unlock;
+ ret = extent_same_check_offsets(dst, dst_loff, &len, olen);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out_unlock;
+
+ if (same_inode) {
/*
* Single inode case wants the same checks, except we
* don't want our length pushed out past i_size as
@@ -3171,16 +3172,6 @@ static int btrfs_extent_same(struct inode *src, u64 loff, u64 olen,
same_lock_start = min_t(u64, loff, dst_loff);
same_lock_len = max_t(u64, loff, dst_loff) + len - same_lock_start;
- } else {
- btrfs_double_inode_lock(src, dst);
-
- ret = extent_same_check_offsets(src, loff, &len, olen);
- if (ret)
- goto out_unlock;
-
- ret = extent_same_check_offsets(dst, dst_loff, &len, olen);
- if (ret)
- goto out_unlock;
}
/* don't make the dst file partly checksummed */
--
2.10.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
