On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 04:26:34PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 09:40:49AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Just saw this during a xfstests auto run on virtio with default
> > XFS parameters. I don't think I saw this before when running the
> > same config, so it might not be 100% reproducible. I'd be surpised
> > if my laptop has bad ram, but who knows..
>
> Does your kernel have commit b77428b12b5 ("xfs: defer should abort
> intent items if the trans roll fails") in it? I saw similar symptoms
> and fixed them with that patch.
>
> (Patch should appear in -rc5 tomorrow.)
Let me try to reproduce it - I though I was just testing latest
for-next with my direct I/O changes, which would have it included,
but I just noticed I made a mess off my tree due to an unfinished
rebase, so maybe I actually was using an older base.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
