Re: About reflink len = 0 behavior

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Add cc to new xfs mail list.


At 10/20/2016 03:46 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Hi Darrick, xfs guys and btrfs guys.

Although such question is quite late as reflink generic tests are in
fstests for a long time, I'm still not sure what's the correct behavior
for reflink len = 0.

Test case generic/182 is causing different output between btrfs and xfs.

For btrfs, dedupe will just return 0 and check nothing, while for xfs
len == 0 means to check the whole file length.

Both makes sense for me, for btrfs len = 0 behavior, it just follows
read/write functions.
And I assume xfs follows reflink behavior, when len is not specified,
then reflink the length of src file.

But since it's a generic test, we need to unify the behavior.

So, which one is the standard and which document should we follow for
such behavior definition?

Thanks,
Qu


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux