There are a couple of places where we don't check the inode's
reflink flag before calling into the reflink code. Fix those,
and add some asserts so we don't make this mistake again.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c | 4 ++--
fs/xfs/xfs_super.c | 12 +++++++-----
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
index 685c419..9c58b4a 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
@@ -624,6 +624,7 @@ xfs_reflink_cancel_cow_range(
int error;
trace_xfs_reflink_cancel_cow_range(ip, offset, count);
+ ASSERT(xfs_is_reflink_inode(ip));
offset_fsb = XFS_B_TO_FSBT(ip->i_mount, offset);
if (count == NULLFILEOFF)
@@ -1510,8 +1511,7 @@ xfs_reflink_clear_inode_flag(
int nmaps;
int error = 0;
- if (!(ip->i_d.di_flags2 & XFS_DIFLAG2_REFLINK))
- return 0;
+ ASSERT(xfs_is_reflink_inode(ip));
fbno = 0;
end = XFS_B_TO_FSB(mp, i_size_read(VFS_I(ip)));
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
index 72bde28..ade4691 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
@@ -947,11 +947,13 @@ xfs_fs_destroy_inode(
XFS_STATS_INC(ip->i_mount, vn_rele);
XFS_STATS_INC(ip->i_mount, vn_remove);
- error = xfs_reflink_cancel_cow_range(ip, 0, NULLFILEOFF);
- if (error && !XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(ip->i_mount))
- xfs_warn(ip->i_mount, "Error %d while evicting CoW blocks "
- "for inode %llu.",
- error, ip->i_ino);
+ if (xfs_is_reflink_inode(ip)) {
+ error = xfs_reflink_cancel_cow_range(ip, 0, NULLFILEOFF);
+ if (error && !XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(ip->i_mount))
+ xfs_warn(ip->i_mount,
+"Error %d while evicting CoW blocks for inode %llu.",
+ error, ip->i_ino);
+ }
xfs_inactive(ip);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
